Diceand the laws of Probability
For an ext questions and also problems regarding dice (and coin)probabilities, please seethis page.
You are watching: Probability of rolling at least one 6 in 4 rolls
Let"simagine you room playing a game which uses dice. You are around to rollthree of them. You need to roll at least one 6. A 6 showing up onany one (or more) the the three dice will win the video game for you! What areyour chances?
Quitesome time ago, ns was over at a friend"s house watching him and anotherfriend beat a board game dubbed Axis & Allies.At one suggest this specific scenario come up - Kent was planning on rollingthree dice and also reallywanted at the very least one 6 to appear. The made a comment that with threedice, his chances were 3/6 or 50%.
Kent"sreasoning was, with one die, the opportunities of rolling a 6 were 1/6 which is correct. Healso thought if he were to roll 2 dice, his possibilities were twin thisor 2/6. This is not correct andthis is where his faulty thinking begins.
Knowinga small bit around the regulations of probability, I easily knew the fraction"2/6" for 2 dice and also "3/6" for 3 dice to be incorrect and also spent a short moment computing and also then explaining the true percentages. Unfortunately, I execute notbelieve I did well in explaining come Kent why my figures werecorrect. Perhaps I can do therefore here. The knowledge acquired could definitely be very useful if you great toplay free craps games.
Obviously,with Kent"s reasonable above, if the opportunities of roll a 6 v two dice is2/6 and also the opportunities ofrolling a 6 with three dice is 3/6, then the opportunities of rojo a 6with six dice would be 6/6 no 100%?? that course, this is obviouslyincorrect. Ns don"t care how numerous dice friend roll, the possibilities of rollinga 6 will never ever be 100%.
Whenyou roll simply one die, there room six various ways the die deserve to land,as shown by the complying with graphic:
Whentwo dice room rolled, over there are now 36 different and also unique methods thedice can come up. This figure is came down on by multiply the numberof means the first die can come increase (six) by the variety of ways thesecond die deserve to come up (six). 6 x 6 = 36.
Thisgraphic shows this very nicely. I"ve offered two various colored dies tohelp show a roll of 2-1 is different from a role of 1-2.
Ifyou usage the above graphic and count the number of times is 6 appearswhen two dice are rolled, friend will check out the prize is eleven. Eleventimes the end of 36 or 30.5 %, slightly less than the 33.3% (2/6) Kent thought. Whenyou roll 2 dice, you have a 30.5 % opportunity at least one 6 will appear.
Thisfigure can additionally be identified mathematically, without the use of thegraphic. One method to perform so is to take it the number of ways a solitary diewill NOT show a 6 as soon as rolled (five) and also multiply this by the number ofways the 2nd die will NOT display a 6 when rolled. (Also five.) 5 x 5 =25. Subtract this indigenous the total number of ways two dice have the right to appear(36) and we have actually our answer...eleven.
So,let"s usage this same method to answer ours question and also determine thechances of at the very least one 6 showing up when three diceare rolled.
Takethe chances of a 6 NOT showing up on the an initial die...
5 / 6
andmultiply this by the chances of a 6 NOT showing up on the 2nd die...
5 / 6 x 5 / 6 = 25 / 36
andmultiply this by the possibilities of a 6 NOT showing up on the third die...
25 / 36 x 5 / 6 = 125 / 216
So,there room 125 the end of 216 possibilities of a 6 NOT appearing when three diceare rolled. Just subtract 125 indigenous 216 i beg your pardon will give us the chancesa 6 WILL appear when three dice room rolled, i beg your pardon is 91. 91 the end of 216or 42.1 %, not quite the 50% Kent initially thought.
Hereis a table reflecting the fractions and also percentages that a 6 appearing (orany other single digit for the matter) and also notappearing through several different numbers that dice: