Even the boldest, most confident writers deserve to cower in fear and also sob through frustration when challenged with the trouble of whether to use who or whom in a sentence. Heck, I know it confuses me.

You are watching: Whom i am or who i am

Here’s the distinction: usage who to refer to the topic of the sentence (“I to be the human being who you are looking for”) and whom to refer to the thing of the sentence (“Whom have actually you invited?”)

If you’re quiet unsure around which form to use in a sentence, try this test: Restate the sentence through a an individual pronoun, or, if the is a question, price the inquiry with one word. If the an individual pronoun in the restatement or solution is he or she, who is correct. If that him or her, whom is correct.

Statement: “I have a friend who have the right to help.”Restatement: “He have the right to help.” (Who is correct.)

Question: “Whom have actually you invited?”Response: “Him.” (Whom is correct.)

Note, however, that occasionally you deserve to avoid the trouble of identify which type to usage by omitting a family member pronoun altogether, and the an outcome is frequently an improvement. For example, the sentence “I am the human who you are looking for” is much better rendered as “I am the person you are looking for.”

Also, beware of this pitfalls: “They’ll complain to whoever whomever> will listen” is correct, because whoever is the subject of “will listen.” However, “Whomever whoever> you hire is fine with me” is correct because whomever is the object of hire.

Furthermore, usage of whom in a sentence such together “It was Smith and also Jones who we had to contend with” is a hypercorrection. (“It was Smith and Jones who we had actually to compete with” is correct, despite the sentence is far better with the pronoun omitted: “It was Smith and Jones we had actually to contend with.”) Append a phrase containing the same pronoun come realize just how awkward this kind is. (“It to be Smith and Jones whom we had actually to complete with, who some among us feared.”)

These complications, and also others, make classic rules concerning use the whom problematic; when even experienced writers need to repeatedly pore with a grammar message to repeat themselves about the details, the difference has end to it is in practical. The fusty who/whom distinction is fading in conversational usage, and also it is my enthusiasm hope that the use of whom other than in unambiguous “to whom” build will an in similar way atrophy.

I’ll let legend language maven william Safire have actually the last word: of this issue, the said, in effect, once the inquiry of even if it is to use whom or who arises, review the sentence so the you don’t need to puzzle over which kind is correct.

Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? obtain a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and also exercises daily!

Keep learning! browse the Grammar category, check our famous posts, or choose a related post below:


*
girlfriend will enhance your English in just 5 minutes every day, guaranteed! Subscribers get accessibility to ours archives with 800+ interactive exercises! You"ll also get 3 bonus ebooks completely free! try It free Now

26 Responses come “How execute You identify Whether to use Who or Whom?”

Gordon Havenson march 19, 2013 9:51 am

Excellent posting. Well-written and valuable. A keeper.

Dan Ericksonon march 19, 2013 10:02 am

Who and also whom have the right to be a challenge, however my greatest hurdle is the lay, lie, laid dilemma. Possibly you can do a short article on the in the close to future.

Mike Szczepanikon march 19, 2013 10:26 am

In your 2nd paragraph, in the example “I am the human who you are looking for,” isn’t the loved one pronoun in reality the thing of the preposition “for,” which would certainly make it “I to be the human whom you are looking for”? It’s easier to watch if we relocate “for” before the pronoun: “I am the person for who you room looking.” The very same goes because that the example “It to be Smith and also Jones whom we had actually to contend with”–the pronoun is the object of the preposition “with,” therefore “whom” is correct. I agree with you and also Safire: the sooner “who” becomes acceptable in nearly all cases (pun intended), the better.

Ellenon march 19, 2013 11:16 am

Hello.

Yes, likewise, this example requires “whom”:

“It to be Smith and also Jones who we had to complete with.”

We deserve to test this by asking, “We had to compete with whom?”

I do like Mark’s tip to eliminate the relative pronoun.

I appreciate the difficulty presented by examples designed to highlight points of grammar. Its’ simple to obtain lost in the maze that explanations.

–Ellen

Bobon in march 19, 2013 4:05 pm

Who does things to Whom.

Matt Gaffneyon in march 19, 2013 4:46 pm

I’m astonished to learn that experienced writers and also those who would favor to be experienced writers are often baffled by the who/whom question. This is fifth-grade grammar.

“Whom” is provided not just as the thing of the predicate (not “object of the sentence”), but additionally as object of a preposition, i.e., its usage is restricted to the target case.

The sentence “I to be the human being who you are looking for” is incorrect indigenous the getgo in the “who” need to be “whom.” the doesn’t have to be adjusted dramatically, simply made grammatical, e.g., “I’m the person for who you’re looking.”

“It to be Smith and also Jones that we had to compete with” in absolutely incorrect. It should be written “It was Smith and also Jones v whom we had to contend.” The entire example is rather poorly conceived, an especially the appended phrase. Quite than create “It to be Smith and also Jones whom we had to compete with, whom some amongst us feared,” write “It to be Smith and Jones, fear by some amongst us, v whom we had to contend.”

Who/whom is not a “fusty” distinction; that is an educated distinction. Much more and more nowadays, those that aren’t too educated as they imagine castle are and as they great others come deem them, dismiss as “fusty” those centuries-old conventions the they i can not use mastered quite than recognize to themselves and also their public that they aren’t together authoritative as they’d prefer others come think castle are. It’s virtually as if lock say, “If i don’t understand it, it’s no worth knowing.”

Experienced writers might indeed have difficulties with who/whom; an excellent writers don’t have such problems. As for Safire’s advice, that knew his audience, i.e., those who eventually paid to review what the wrote. The was constantly easier to comfort the forlorn than to organize them come a standard higher than that implemented on fifth-graders.

Danielleon march 19, 2013 5:08 pm

When ns was a sophomore in high school, mine teacher taught us the S-L-A-P / N-N-O-O technique.

S = subject ————>Nominative (Who)L = Linking Verb ———–>Nominative (Who)A = action Verb ————->Objective (Whom)P = Preposition ————–>Objective (Whom)

To this day, I use this diagram.

Mike Melloron in march 19, 2013 5:39 pm

This is one of the extremely rare instances where having studied Latin pays off.

“Whom” is the dative and also ablative form of “who.”

Use “whom” with the preposition to, by, for, and with.

This applies only to created English. For talked English, uneven you’re a member the the British royal Family, feel totally free to eliminate “whom” from her vocabulary.

I speak “good” English and also I would never say, “I to be the human for whom you are looking.”

I frequently break the rule about never ending a sentence v a preposition and would say, “I’m the human being who you’re feather for.” In truth I’d leave out the “who” entirely: “I’m the human being you’re feather for.”

Oddly enough, “whom” is far an ext popular among Americans than among the British. If you see a writer using words “whomever,” it’s one of two people a 19th-century brother or one American, lol!

Gregory Bryceon march 19, 2013 8:21 pm

I take it hypercorrection to average trying so tough to it is in correct that one uses building that in the particular case is wrong.

I apologize for the erroneous example, mentioned to me by number of readers in the comments and others in email messages, and also I thank them for the clarification. Together I mentioned, i have an obstacle with this topic, and also I should have actually researched it more thoroughly before writing around it.

Gregory Bryceon march 19, 2013 8:35 pm

Should have taken the moment to proofread mine post.

I wrote:>>Like others, I’d say over there is no hypercorrection in that an initial sentence. That is perfect correct; “whom” is the object of the pronoun “with.” Dale A. Woodon march 19, 2013 8:47 pm

The distinction in English is easy, and the explanations in the article are overblown and often incorrect. I will certainly go come a basic rebuke: shame on you, note Nichol.The short, sweet explanation:“Who” is in the subjective instance in its clause.“Whom” is in the objective situation in its clause.

The an interpretation of subjective instance should it is in obvious.In English, the objective instance is provided for these:1. Straight objects.2. Objects of prepositions.3. Indirect objects.For an instance of number three: “You provided WHOM every one of the liquid in the house!?” ns emphasized WHOM for the additional reason of spoken emphasis. Perhaps WHOM describes the 350 pound bum in the neighborhood.

In languages prefer Latin and German, over there are extr cases for miscellaneous objects – situations that English disposed of a lengthy time ago, say thanks to goodness. The three cases in English are subjective, objective, and possessive. German has cases that corresponds to all of these, plus the “dative case”, i m sorry is used for indirect objects and also as the goals of particular pronouns.Latin has cases that correspond to every for that these, add to one dubbed the “ablative case” the I never ever understood and also I don’t want to.From what I have actually read, Russian, Ukrainian, and Polise have even more cases than these because that nouns and pronouns.

Let’s just be thankful that English is in the reasonable ar where it is. ~ above the other hand, in most dialects that Chinese, nouns and also pronouns execute not have any kind of cases, and also verbs space not conjugated! Chinese also does not have actually the equivalents that a, an, the. This is why people where “false Chinese” sentences like:“Confucius say: man who live in glass residence throw couple of stones,” and“Confucius say: guy who live in glass home hang lot of curtains.”

We walk not decline or conjugate anything except that we did put the “s” top top “stones” and also the “s” ~ above “curtains”. In reality, Chinese walk not have singular or plural noun or pronouns.Everything choose that is done through adjectives and also adverbs.D.A.W.

Mark Nicholon march 19, 2013 8:49 pm

Matt:

In mine previous comment, ns thanked those, including you, who strove to assist me and also others know this topic, but I’d like that you monitor the instance of practically every other human who comments on this site and be more courteous. I don’t like criticism any more than anyone else, however I expropriate it as a crucial component to self-improvement. Her comments, however, are caustic rather than constructive, and also it is daunting for me to do so with good grace.

See more: Of Mice And Men Chapter 2 Summary Of Mice And Men Chapter 2 Summary

Your enthusiasm defense that the who/whom difference is admirable, yet speakers and writers of English room slowly but inexorably eliminating whom from all but the most apparent usage (“to whom”). Ns applaud this advance because I watch no handy use for the distinction, no meaning to the signal, and also I’ll write approximately it once possible, and also do so through a clear conscience.

Dale A. Woodon march 19, 2013 9:16 pm

We could additionally make up silly sentences like, “You provided WHOM every one of the marijuana in the house!?” (or “all of the money”)

There is an additional problem with loved one pronouns, and the exact same thing is true in English and also in German (with slightly-different words).“Which” is the loved one pronoun because that inanimate objects and also for extract entities prefer companies, corporations, countries, states, counties, crews, groups, set, teams, and staffs. For a specific example, a team is a “which” and not a “who”. Likewise, an wait force, an army, or a marine is a “which” and also not a “who” **.

For example, “Cisco Systems, Inc., i m sorry is located in California,” and NOT “Cisco Systems, Inc., who are located in California.”

“Which” is unchanged in between the spatu case and also the objective case, and also which is likewise unchanged in between singular and also plural.Now, what is the possessive case of “which”? It might be difficult to think that it, but the possessive situation is “whose”. Because that example:“The car whose radiator is cracked is leaking radiator fluid almost everywhere the floor of the garage.”

In German, the relative pronoun that synchronizes to “which” is “welch”, and also “welch” is both subjective and objective, and both singular and also plural. That is possessive instance is “wessen”, which coincides to “whose”.To additional complicate things, “welch” has a datil case, too. As ideal as i recall, the precise type of the dative case depends top top the gender of the antecedent: masculine, feminine, or neuter.

**In brother writings, I have actually seen such abominations as “the RAF, who are looking for the lost mariners in the north Sea…” Who??

“Who’s ~ above first, what’s on second, and also I don’t know’s top top third!”Costello: “Who’s top top first?” Abbot: “Who!”

Dale A. Woodon march 19, 2013 9:22 pm

I have actually just notice my own error in inputting “Polise” instead of “Polish”.“mea maxima culpa!” (More Latin)